Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
02/01/2011 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB39 | |
SJR4 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | SB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SJR 4 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 39-U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMPACT CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI announced SB 39 to be the first order of business to come before the committee. SENATOR HOLLIS FRENCH, sponsor of SB 39, explained that this bill was in the Senate last year, and it is designed to ensure a basic truth is upheld; the person who gets the most votes will become the president of the United States. He stated that the last decade has seen candidates being elected president without having the highest popular vote total. He further noted that, if SB 39 is enacted into law, Alaska would join with a group of states forming a compact to pledge its electoral votes to the candidate receiving the most popular votes. 9:04:07 AM ANDY MODEROW, staff to Senator Hollis French, explained that SB 39 provides that any state of the United States and the District of Columbia can become a member of this agreement by enacting the agreement. He further explained that SB 39 sets out the right of the people in the member states to vote for president by statewide popular election. He said Article 3 allows that, before the meeting and voting by the presidential electors, each chief election official of each member state shall determine the number of votes for each presidential candidate, and the states shall add the votes together to reach a national popular vote total. 9:06:16 AM CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked about the issue of recounts between states. SENATOR FRENCH said nothing in SB 39 affects the right of each state to count its own votes in its own manner. Ms. Fenumiai would still be the person in charge should Alaska agree to join this compact. 9:07:25 AM MR. MODEROW further explained that SB 39 certifies the appointment of the elector slate for the candidate associated with that national popular vote winner. Six days before the meeting and voting by the presidential electors, the members shall make a final determination of the number of popular votes cast in the state and shall communicate that to other states for the purposes of the compact. The chief election official of each member state shall release a conclusive statement of the number of votes cast for each candidate. He also explained that if there is a tie for the national popular vote winner, the certifying official of each member state will certify the appointment of the electors nominated by the vote in the state. 9:08:43 AM CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the chief election official referred to Ms. Gail Fenumiai. SENATOR FRENCH responded yes, currently. 9:09:08 AM MR. MODEROW then discussed what would occur if a member state sends a different number of electors than they have electoral votes; in that case, the national popular vote winner would nominate the presidential electors, and the state election official would certify the appointment of those nominees. He noted that the bill also creates a blackout period requiring that member states cannot withdraw from the compact for a period of time before and after the election. SENATOR PASKVAN asked how many states have passed the compact. MR. MODEROW responded that he thinks 20 states, but he is not certain. 9:10:53 AM CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the chief executive of each member state refers to the governor. MR. MODEROW responded yes. He further stated that definitions are provided on page 3, line 28, through page 4, line 21. 9:11:44 AM MR. MODEROW explained that section 2 clarifies that current law will stay on the books until enough states have activated the compact. 9:12:15 AM MR. MODEROW further explained that SB 39 contains provisions for how the compact will be enacted. 9:12:52 AM LAURA BROAD, testifying on behalf of National Popular Vote, stated she spent eight years as a representative in the Minnesota state legislature, where she was a co-sponsor of the National Popular Vote Act. She said the National Popular Vote agreement would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who wins the most popular votes. The bill has been enacted in seven states, and has been enacted by jurisdictions possessing a total of 74 electoral votes, which is 27 percent of the votes necessary to trigger the compact. She said that the shortcomings of the current statutory system stem from the winner-take-all rule, which effectively awards a state's electoral votes to the candidate who wins the most popular votes in that state. The winner-take-all rule has permitted a candidate to win the presidency without winning the most popular votes in 1 of 56 presidential elections, which is 1 in 14 times. She further stated that Article II, Section I, of the United States Constitution gives states the exclusive authority and exclusive control over the manner of awarding electoral votes; thus, the winner-take-all rule is not in the U.S. Constitution, but is actually a matter of state law. 9:17:34 AM MS. BROAD explained that Maine and Nebraska use a different system from the other states, which shows a state's right to award electors under its own rules. Under the national popular vote system, all electoral votes would be awarded to the candidate who wins the most popular votes. Two-hundred-seventy electoral votes are needed to ratify the compact. SB 39 also preserves the Electoral College, but in a way that makes sure that every vote is equal. 9:19:29 AM MS. BROAD further stated that SB 39 would not abolish the Electoral College, nor would it render the Electoral College irrelevant; instead, it utilizes a state's right to benefit the people of Alaska and the people of all states. She noted the bill is not an end-run around the Constitution, because it very explicitly states in Article II, Section I that state legislatures have the full authority and the responsibility to award electors as they see fit. MS. BROAD noted the founders originally intended that small states have an electoral advantage through an additional two electoral votes, but the winner-take-all system undermines the original intent. Candidates now become focused solely on battleground states, because influence is no longer derived from the number of electoral votes. 9:21:23 AM MS. BROAD concluded by saying that SB 39 would ensure that people know their vote counts, would preserve the electoral college, fix shortcomings in the current system, and recognize and utilize an explicit states' right set forth by the founders in the constitution. SENATOR PASKVAN asked if in a close election, a small state like Alaska could decide to give its three electoral votes in order to effectively change the results. What would be the penalty? MS. BROAD responded that interstate compacts are authorized within the constitution to give sovereign states the authority to enter into legally binding contracts. She explained that states are not allowed to breach those contracts; states that enter into the compact can choose to leave, but only under provisions of the contract. She noted this is a legally enforceable tool, and that contracts actually take precedence over statutes. 9:27:53 AM SENATOR MEYER asked how many states are currently in the compact. MS. BROAD replied that seven states are currently in the compact, and those states possess a total of 27 percent of the electoral votes needed to trigger the compact. If Alaska passes this bill, nothing changes until the trigger of 220 electoral votes is reached. SENATOR MEYER asked if Alaska would still be just a fly-over state, in terms of presidential campaigning. MS. BROAD responded that Minnesota currently has a governor who didn't win any of the five largest cities in the state, yet he won the governor's race twice because he drove up the vote in rural and suburban areas. If this compact was adopted, presidential candidates would need to reach out to a broad swath of people in order to win. 9:30:37 AM SENATOR GIESSEL noted that Minnesota is not one of the states that have ratified the agreement. MS. BROAD responded that she is expecting it to be passed this year. SENATOR GIESSEL asked if she would explain the blackout period. MS. BROAD responded that purpose of the blackout period is to bind the states to the compact for the length of the election campaign, July 20th through January 20th, because voters should know the rules of engagement. CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked how the national popular vote works in connection with the Electoral College. 9:33:01 AM MS. BROAD responded that each state currently has the power to deal with electors in its own way. Under the current system, electors will always align with the candidate who wins the popular vote. If a democratic candidate wins the popular vote, a democratic slate of electors would go to the capitol and cast ballots. Under a national popular vote, that is no different; the slates are aligned with the candidate winning the majority of the popular vote. CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked about the recount issue. MS. BROAD replied that recounts would continue to operate under state statutes, and that does not change under the national popular vote. 9:35:04 AM SEAN PATTERSON, representing himself, Anchorage, supported SB 39, and stated it is probably the first time he has agreed with Senator French. He noted that our founding fathers understood that our democracy is a growing, living and changing entity; under the current system, many states don't count. Our republic has gotten to the point where each vote should be counted. 9:38:55 AM DON THERING, representing himself, Delta Junction, stated he supports SB 39 because the Electoral College system needs to more accurately represent the country as it is today. 9:39:54 AM ALLISON GLOVER, representing herself, Anchorage, said she believes passage of SB 39 would be good for Alaska. 9:40:24 AM CAROLYN BROWN, representing herself, Juneau, stated she has lived in Alaska since 1965, including Anchorage, Palmer, and Juneau, and has worked throughout the state as a public health and OBGYN physician. Dr. Brown noted that six states and the District of Columbia have already passed the compact: Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, and the District of Columbia. She supports SB 39 because she is committed to participatory democracy, and she asked for reasoned consideration and thoughtful debate on this issue. 9:43:24 AM JIM GILL, student, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, testified in support of SB 39. 9:44:07 AM MARJORIE MENZI, Juneau, stated she was here as a citizen in support of SB 39. As a civics educator, social studies teacher, and voter registrar, she said she believes the president and vice-president should be determined by nationwide popular vote. She stated that according to a recent poll, 70 percent of Alaskans agree. She further stated that the current system is a disincentive to voters in Alaska. 9:49:08 AM CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI closed public testimony and held SB 39 in committee for further consideration.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
SB 39 Fiscal Note DOE.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMPACT |
SB 39 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMPACT |
SB 39 Sectional.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMPACT |
SB 39 One Page Summary.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
SB 39 Alaska Poll Results.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMPACT |
SB 39 Editorials.pdf |
SSTA 2/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMPACT |